Michael Owen has said he still considers Liverpool to be the best team in the Premier League, even though the club has endured a difficult season and fallen short of expectations.
Owen, a former Liverpool and England striker, shared his view while assessing the current landscape of the Premier League. He argued that, at full strength and playing to their potential, Liverpool’s overall quality and structure remain superior to their domestic rivals, including Arsenal.
While recent results and league position have not reflected that assessment, Owen pointed to the broader picture of Liverpool’s squad and recent years of performance. Though specific details of his comments were not provided, his stance suggests he is looking beyond a single season’s form and focusing instead on the squad’s peak level, tactical identity and what he believes is their highest possible standard of play.
Liverpool’s campaign has been marked by inconsistency and challenges, including dropped points and performances below the levels set in previous title‑contending seasons. In contrast, Arsenal have been competing strongly near the top of the table and are widely regarded as one of the league’s most improved and cohesive sides. Despite that, Owen maintained that, in his opinion, Liverpool still possess the strongest team overall.
His remarks highlight a common debate among supporters and pundits: whether the “best” team is defined by current league position and recent form, or by the perceived maximum level a squad can reach when all key players are available and in rhythm. Owen appears to be leaning toward the latter definition, viewing Liverpool through the lens of their best performances and established core under their current structure.
The former Ballon d’Or winner’s view is likely to spark discussion among fans of both Liverpool and Arsenal, as well as neutrals. With the season still unfolding and several clubs closely matched in quality and ambition, the question of which side truly is the best in the Premier League remains open to interpretation, shaped by whether one prioritises present results or underlying potential.
